YingFeng connects mCAD design and nesting with the main program’s production workflow. Prepare part geometry, quantities, sheets and head assignments, then check toolpaths, processes and jobs under the current machine conditions.
When drawings, quantities and machine settings are handled separately, a compact layout may still be impossible to cut. Shared rails, head travel, physical spacing and tool processes need to be checked together.
For soft sheet stock cuttable with an oscillating knife, such as foam and sponge. Honeycomb, sealing and insulation applications require confirmation of material thickness, blade suitability and a test cut.
Prepare single-head or multi-head plans for the actual machine. Before network transfer, verify the target’s heads, sheet and physical limits, then confirm on-site production conditions in the main program.
Illustrative animation, not a live machine. Actual processing depends on software checks and site conditions.
Review nested counts, head assignments, routes and estimated time, then continue checking quantities and progress in production jobs. Outcomes depend on parts, configuration and on-site validation.
Get mCAD, test your drawings and layouts, then discuss machine integration with the technical team.
Get mCADDiscuss system integration ↗Help centre ↗Download mCAD and create separate projects with the real dimensions of your regular parts. Compare machine models and head counts with the same sheet, requested quantities, spacing and allowed angles.
Import regular drawings or draw at actual millimetre dimensions; check closed outlines and internal holes or slots.
Create a separate project for each machine configuration and set sheet size, physical head count, participating heads, margins and spacing.
Nest the same parts by quantity or fill-sheet mode; record actual nested counts and inspect head assignments.
Pass each project’s safety check and generate dynamic toolpaths; compare estimated time, parallel head use, waiting and rapid travel.
Review shared-rail, physical head spacing and actual travel constraints, then compare additional heads with a lower head count.
A denser layout or more heads alone cannot prove faster cutting. Compare successfully planned current results with confirmed material thickness, tools, speed mode, shared rail and travel limits.
Doubling the head count does not guarantee double productivity. If large regular parts cannot synchronize within shared-axis and safety-spacing constraints, fewer heads may suit them better. Standalone estimates support comparison; machine selection still requires actual parameters and test cuts.
Follow the drawing, nesting and job-planning workflows relevant to your parts and machines.
When drawings, quantities and machine settings are handled separately, a compact layout may still be impossible to cut. Shared rails, head travel, physical spacing and tool processes need to be checked together.
↗02Open outlines, incorrect dimensions or missing group members affect nesting. Repair the drawing, then recognize and save useful manually placed groups for later complete-group reuse and remaining single parts.
↗03Rapid travel, waiting, tool lift and lowering, curve speed and head coordination all affect cutting time. Material utilization alone misses batch counts and actual process conditions.
↗04Large regular parts, different contours or narrow gaps can restrict parallel work. Non-cutting heads remain physical objects and need reachable parking positions and avoidance checks.
↗05An import, a visible layout or a Send click does not by itself prove correct dimensions, valid routes or a saved host job. Review the current result and actual receipts at each step.
↗